State v. Cahoon’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2013
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Oppenheimer · State v. Lusk · United States v. Hill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“resulted in a finding of not guilty by the trier of facts or in a determination that there was insufficient evidence to warrant conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cahoon“determination inconsistent with a fact that must be established to secure conviction in the subsequent prosecution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sommerville
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.