2007 UT App 324 - State v. Castillo’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2012
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Hamilton · Carter v. Hewitt · United States v. Layton · State v. Jaeger · State v. Pendergrass
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'We review a trial court's decision to admit or exclude evidence under [rlule 403 ... [using] an abuse of discretion standard'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“court may exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of ... unfair prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cristobal
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.