Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2007 UT App 332 - State v. Miller

2007 UT App 332 - State v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2020
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2020

8 state decisions

40200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 101 Cal. App. 4th 155 - People v. Bernal · State v. Applegate · State v. Dillon · Allstate Insurance Co. v. Ivie · 25 Utah 2d 380 - Belt v. Turner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[An appellate court] will not disturb a trial court's order of restitution unless the trial court exceeds the authority prescribed by law or abuses its discretion. Furthermore, [wihether a restitution [award] is proper ... depends solely upon interpretation of the governing statute, and the trial court's interpretation of a statute presents a question of law, which [this court] review[s] for correctness.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a person could recover in a civil action arising out of the facts or events constituting the defendant's criminal activities....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'[WJhether a restitution [award] is proper ... depends solely upon interpretation of the governing statute, and the trial court's interpretation of a statute presents a question of law, which we review for correctness?”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.