Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2007 UTAPP 350 - State v. Redding

State v. Redding’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood · State v. Dunn · State v. Winfield · State v. Larsen · State v. Bakalov

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the doctrine of invited error, we have declined to engage in even plain error review when counsel, either by statement or act, affirmatively represented to the trial court that he or she had no objection to the action taken.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The doctrine of invited error prohibits a party from setting up an error at trial and then complaining of it on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.