2007 UT App 5 - State v. Harter’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
October 2019
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc. · State v. Litherland · State v. Clark · State v. Kelley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[the court need not identify each of the Shickles factors in its analysis as long as we can discern that it made a sufficient inquiry under rule 408.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[The trial court acknowledged that [the victim's] testimony about her prior injuries was offered for the proper, noncharacter purpose of demonstrating [the victim's] state of mind-her fear of {[the dlefendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Labrum“overcome the presumption that ... the challenged action 'might be considered sound trial strategy'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Garrido
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.