2007 UT App 61 - Wall v. Wall’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Childs v. Childs · Kelley v. Kelley · 2005 UT App 327 - Okelberry v. WEST DANIELS LAND ASSOCIATION · Bolliger v. Bolliger · Wells v. Wells
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] material change in cireumstances [is] contemplated in a divorce decree [if] there ... [is] evidence, preferably in the form of a provision within the decree itself, that the [district] court anticipated the specific change.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'[Iln divorce proceedings, when the trial court has awarded attorney fees below to the party who then prevails on the main issues on appeal, we generally award fees on appeal.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[QJuestions about the legal adequacy of findings of fact and the legal accuracy of the trial court's statements present issues of law, which we review for correctness.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.