2007 UT App 65 - State v. Levin’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rhode Island v. Innis · Berkemer v. McCarty · California v. Beheler · Stansbury v. California · Key Tronic Corp. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[Nlo [objective] indicia of arrest such as readied handcuffs, locked doors[,] or drawn guns were present'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Tingey · State v. Heywood“the other three factors indicate an absence of custody, and [we] halve] emphasized that these factors may outweigh the single factor that the investigation had focused on [the defendant].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Heywood“[A] person is in custody for purposes of Miranda when the person's ‘freedom of action is curtalled to a degree associated with formal arrest.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tingey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.