2007 UT App 86 - State v. Hogue’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “dilated pupils, nervous demeanor, and jerky body movements”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Stewart · 2019 UT App 50 - State v. Martinez-Castellanos

2. “We abandon the standard which extended 'some deference' to the application of law to the underlying factual findings in search and seizure cases in favor of non-deferential review.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 2007 UT App 266 - State v. Dennis

3. “suspicion based on specific, articulable facts drawn from the totality of the circumstances facing the officer at the time of the stop.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Stewart