State v. Ford’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably State v. Ndina (2009), 326 Wis. 2d 685 - State v. Harris (2010)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Arizona v. Fulminante · Johnson v. United States · Neder v. United States · Sullivan v. Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A motion for mistrial is committed to the sound discretion of the circuit court.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Generally, in determining whether to grant a mistrial ... the circuit court must decide, in light of the entire facts and circumstances, whether the defendant can receive a fair trial. It examines whether the claimed error is sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a mistrial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“seriously affect the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings and are so fundamental that they are considered per se prejudicial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.