Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2007 WI 58 - State v. Nelis

State v. Nelis’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
3
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably State v. Stokes (2009), State v. Kandutsch (2011)

25 state decisions

180200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · United States v. Owens · State v. Hale · State v. Manuel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he record does not establish that. . . Stone was unavailable for further cross-examination after his earlier testimony at trial. He was called as a witness and testified.... After. . . Stone was subjected to direct, cross, and redirect examination, the court told him that he could "step down." There is nothing in the record indicating the whereabouts of. . . Stone after that. The record certainly demonstrates that. . . Stone had been examined extensively, at trial, about his observations concerning the alleged sexual assault. We are satisfied that the record presented fails to establish that.. . Stone was unavailable, so that he could not have been recalled to testify again about his observations after the testimony of [the police chief].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the Confrontation Clause places no constraints at all”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.