State v. McCoy’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2008
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 102 Wis. 2d 58 - Hartung v. Hartung · United States v. Lott · 57 Wis. 2d 285 - State v. Simmons · United States v. Moore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The requirements of authentication or identification as a condition precedent to admissibility are satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A perfect chain of custody is not required.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.