Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2007 WIAPP 242 - State v. Markwardt

State v. Markwardt’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Michigan v. Mosley · Davis v. United States · 136 Wis. 2d 333 - State v. Turner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]n assertion that permits reasonable competing inferences demonstrates that a suspect did not sufficiently invoke the right to remain silent”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Although a suspect need not 'speak with the discrimination of an Oxford don,' . . . he must articulate his desire to have counsel present sufficiently clearly that a reasonable police officer in the circumstances would understand the statement to be a request for an attorney.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “I don't want to talk about this any more. I've told you, I've told you everything I can tell you. You just ask me any questions and I just want to get out of here. Throw me in jail, I don't want to think about this.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.