State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 73 Wis. 2d 464 - Mulkovich v. State · 146 Wis. 2d 356 - State v. Lomax
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the adequacy of the court's inquiry into the defendant's complaint; (2) the timeliness of the motion; and (3) whether the alleged conflict between the defendant and the attorney was so great that it likely resulted in a total lack of communication that prevented an adequate defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to prove, by expert testimony if necessary, his contention that he had an irresolvable breakdown in communications with his trial lawyer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jones“I'm not disputing that he may need an interpreter for court. I'm wondering if this additional step of the deaf interpreter is necessary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jones
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.