Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2007 WIAPP 248 - State v. Jones

State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 73 Wis. 2d 464 - Mulkovich v. State · 146 Wis. 2d 356 - State v. Lomax

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the adequacy of the court's inquiry into the defendant's complaint; (2) the timeliness of the motion; and (3) whether the alleged conflict between the defendant and the attorney was so great that it likely resulted in a total lack of communication that prevented an adequate defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “to prove, by expert testimony if necessary, his contention that he had an irresolvable breakdown in communications with his trial lawyer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “I'm not disputing that he may need an interpreter for court. I'm wondering if this additional step of the deaf interpreter is necessary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.