Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2007 WIAPP 27 - State v. Wille

State v. Wille’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Neder v. United States · State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County · 153 Wis. 2d 493 - State v. Poellinger · 211 Wis. 2d 397 - State v. Setagord · 74 Wis. 2d 425 - State v. Lenarchick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Our review of the [circuit] court's jury instructions is deferential; we inquire only whether the [circuit] court misused its broad discretion in instructing the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.