Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2007 WY 193 - Sinning v. State

Sinning v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2026

14 state decisions

60200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. State · Anderson v. State · Trujillo v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he proceedings for probation revocation consist of a two-part process.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A probation revocation hearing is not a trial on a new criminal charge. It is simply an extension of the sentencing procedure resulting from the conviction of the basic charge, coupled with the requirement that the probationer be afforded due process of law before being deprived of the conditional right to liberty granted by probation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.