Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2008 ME 151 - State v. Schmidt

State v. Schmidt’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently August 2025

23 state decisions

180200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bouchard · State v. Ashley · State v. Basu · State v. Moores · State v. Comer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “property in which any person or government other than the actor has an interest that the actor is not privileged to infringe, regardless of the fact that the actor also has an interest in the property_Property in the possession of the actor may not be deemed property of another who has only a security interest therein, even if legal title is in the creditor pursuant to a conditional sales contract or other security agreement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.