Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2008 MT 13 - State v. Marler

State v. Marler’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2022

12 state decisions

60200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Swann · State v. Kemp · State v. Blackcrow · State v. Burkhart · State v. Nielsen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “evidence may corroborate accomplice testimony sufficiently even though standing alone it fails to support a conviction or fails to make out a prima facie case against the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re Tjb
  2. “independent evidence tending to connect [T.J.B.] with the conspiracy to commit [criminal mischief], when viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re Tjb
  3. “unless the testimony is corroborated by other evidence that ... tends to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re Tjb

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.