Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2008 MT 17 - Walters v. Luloff

Walters v. Luloff’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

2 district · 6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cechovic v. Hardin & Associates, Inc. · Farmers Cooperative Ass'n v. Amsden, LLC · In Re the Estate of McDermott · Rosenthal v. County of Madison · HKM Associates v. Northwest Pipe Fittings, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The record must affirmatively establish] (1) that the defendant made a false representation as to a past or existing material fact without any reasonable ground for believing it to be true, regardless of his or her actual belief, with the intent to induce the plaintiffs reliance; and (2) that the plaintiff, unaware of the falsity of the representation, justifiably relied on the representation and suffered damage as a result of that reliance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.