Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2008 MT 18 - State v. Charles McFarlane

State v. Charles McFarlane’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

78 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably State v. Brinson (2009), State v. Deserly (2008)

78 state decisions

340200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. United States · State v. Warclub · State v. White · Hans v. State · State v. Lone Elk

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “adequacy of the district court's interrogation, the benefits obtained from a plea bargain, the withdrawal's timeliness, and other considerations that may affect the credibility of the claims presented.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““A plea of guilty entered by one fully aware of the direct consequences, including the actual value of any commitments made to him by the court, prosecutor, or his own counsel, must stand unless induced by threats (or promises to discontinue improper harassment), misrepresentation (including unfulfilled or unfulfillable promises), or perhaps by promises that are by their nature improper to the prosecutor’s business.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea if the defendant was aware of the direct consequences of such a plea, and if his plea was not induced by threats, misrepresentation, or an improper promise such as a bribe.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.