Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2008 MT 89 - State v. Winkel

State v. Winkel’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently March 2024

22 state decisions

180200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Ashby · State v. Ommundson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Defendant shall not possess or consume intoxicants/alcohol, nor will he enter any place intoxicants are the chief item of sale.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “He will submit to Breathalyzer testing or bodily fluid testing for drugs or alcohol as requested by his Probation & Parole Officer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The Defendant will not enter any casinos or play any games of chance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.