Young v. Young’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 2020
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Reinecke v. Griffeth · Corbett v. Corbett · Simburger v. Simburger · Hanson v. Hanson · Kienzle v. Selensky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[a] Change in parent’s work schedule may also be a change of circumstances material to visitation and has been recognized in other jurisdictions. See Grange v. Grange, 15 Neb.App. 297 , 725 N.W.2d 853, 860 (2006) (a significant change in a party’s work schedule may suffice to reopen the subject of visitation); Ahrens v. Conley, 5 Neb.App. 689 , 563 N.W.2d 370, 372-73 (1997) (change in work schedule, the child’s increased age and child’s preference to spend more time with parent collectively suffice as a material change of circumstances for visitation).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Ritter v. Ritter“A district court's decision to modify [parenting time] is a finding of fact, which will not be reversed unless clearly erroneous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Green v. Swiers“important new facts that were unknown at the time of the initial custody decree or initial parenting time order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Green v. Swiers
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.