State v. Gay’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2021
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Brown v. Illinois · Ybarra v. Illinois · Wyoming v. Sandra Houghton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The State hereby appeals the Court’s Order suppressing evidence in the above entitled matter. This appeal is being made pursuant to NDCC 29-28-07(5), an order granting suppression of evidence. This appeal is not for purpose of delay and the evidence is a substantial proof of a fact material in the proceeding. A hearing was not held in this matter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Peterson“Because the State referenced the appropriate statute, addressed both prongs of the statute, and the relevance of the suppressed evidence is plain, we allow the State's appeal to proceed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Emil“Prosecutors must support their appeals with an explanation of the relevance of the suppressed evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Emil
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.