Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2008 OK CR 13 - King v. State

2008 OK CR 13 - King v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
September 2020
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2020

14 state decisions

90200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lozoya v. State · Canady v. Reynolds · Seabolt v. State · Gomez v. State · 2007 OK CR 3 - State v. District Court of Oklahoma County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To determine legislative intent we may look to each part of the statute, similar statutes, the evils to be remedied, and the consequences of any particular interpretation.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If the Legislature designs a statute for a specific situation, we should give effect to that intent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.