2008 Pa. Super. 64 - Commonwealth v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Walls · 347 Pa. Super. 64 - Commonwealth v. Frazier · 445 Pa. Super. 32 - Commonwealth v. Childs · 2001 Pa. Super. 196 - Commonwealth v. Ritchey · 2002 Pa. Super. 255 - Commonwealth v. Nobalez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(d) Review of record. — In reviewing the record the appellate court shall have regard for: (1) The nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant. (2) The opportunity of the sentencing court to observe the defendant, including any presentence investigation. (3) The findings upon which the sentence was based. (4) The guidelines promulgated by the commission.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.