Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2008 SD 120 - State v. Apple

State v. Apple’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Monette v. Weber (2009), 72 Wis. 2d 754 - State v. Van Meter (1976)

29 state decisions

210200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · McCarthy v. United States · United States v. Dominguez Benitez · Nachtigall v. Erickson · State v. Goodwin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The importance of canvassing the defendant when he enters a guilty plea is vital. For it is at this juncture that the defendant waives his rights and needs to understand the consequences of his plea. Shortcutting the procedure when accepting a guilty plea leaves a question about the defendant’s mental state and understanding. That is why courts have consistently emphasized the importance of the trial court’s dialogue with the defendant in order for the court to satisfy itself that the defendant understands what is at stake and the rights he is relinquishing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.