Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2008 SD 14 - Baldridge v. Weber

Baldridge v. Weber’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 2024

12 state decisions

50200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether a defendant has received ineffective assistance of counsel is essentially a mixed question of law and fact.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “As a general matter, habeas corpus is used to review only: (1) whether the court has jurisdiction of the crime and the person of the defendant; (2) whether the sentence was authorized by law; and (3) whether, in certain cases, a defendant was deprived of basic constitutional rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.