Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2008 SD 57 - DeHaven v. Hall

DeHaven v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
5
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Golden v. Oahe Enterprises, Inc. · Vander Heide v. Boke Ranch, Inc. · Matter of Estate of O'Keefe · Sanford v. Sanford · Nelson v. Nelson Cattle Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “costs of telephonic hearings, costs of telephoto or fax charges, fees of witnesses, interpreters, translators, officers, printers, service of process, filing, expenses from telephone calls, copying, costs of original and copies of transcripts and reporter’s attendance fees, court appointed experts....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he prevailing party in a civil action may recover necessary expenditures “incurred in gathering and procuring evidence or bringing the matter to trial” and “other similar expenses and charges” if these expenditures, expenses and charges are of the same general kind as the ... costs of telephone hearings, costs of telephoto or fax charges, fees of witnesses, interpreters, translators, officers, printer, service of process, filing, expenses from telephone calls, copying, costs of original and copies of transcripts and reporter’s attendance fees, court appointed experts[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[¶ 33.] As to the grant of costs and disbursements to a prevailing party, this Court has stated: A [circuit] court is not required to grant recovery for disbursements simply because a party has achieved the status of a prevailing party. While SDCL 15-17-37 grants no discretion, SDCL 15-17-52 allows a court to”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.