State v. Quartier’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently December 2022
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ornelas v. United States · Adams v. Williams · United States v. Arvizu · United States v. Reinholz · State v. Akuba
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“for suspecting legal wrongdoing. This process allows officers to draw on their own experience and specialized training to make inferences from and deductions about the cumulative information available to them that”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Dahl · State v. Herren“[IJn making a reasonable suspicion determination, we must [look at the totality of the circumstances of each case to see whether the detaining officer has a 'particularized and objective basis' for suspecting legal wrongdoing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Dahl“Reasonable suspicion to stop must be based on 'specific and articulable facts which taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant [the] intrusion'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dahl
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.