Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2008 UT 16 - State v. Eyre

State v. Eyre’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7201

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Lawn v. United States · Sansone v. United States · Peterson v. the Sunrider Corp. · United States v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'To prevail on a felony tax evasion claim, the State must therefore show that a tax was, in fact, due and owing; merely establishing income does not suffice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “failure to object to a jury instruction that [does] not alert the jury to every element of the crime with which his client was charged”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “it is logical to conclude that, if no tax is owing [or no other requirement is binding], there is no tax [or requirement] to evade.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.