Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2008 UT 47 - State v. Bujan

State v. Bujan’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Tome v. United States · State v. Casey · 6 Utah 2d 198 - State v. Sibert · State v. Thomas · State v. Mares

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'On certiorari, we review the court of appeals' decision for correctness, giving its conclusions of law no deference.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'permits the introduction of a declarant's consistent out-of-court statements to rebut a charge of recent fabrication or improper influence or motive ... when those statements were made before the charged recent fabrication or improper influence or motive.!”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The purpose of rule 801(d)(1)(B) is to admit statements that rebut a charge of recent fabrication or improper influence or motive, not to bolster the believability of a statement already uttered at trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.