State v. King’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently July 2025
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Smith v. Phillips · Morgan v. Illinois · Ross v. Oklahoma
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to prevail on [a] claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, [a defendant] must show that his counsel's actions prejudiced him because those actions allowed the seating of an actually biased juror.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Nothing in this rule shall prohibit the court from remanding the case under this rule on its own motion at any time if the claim has been raised and the motion would have been available to a party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sessions“pursuant to our `inherent supervisory power over the courts,' we may presume prejudice . . . where it is `unnecessary and ill-advised to pursue a case-by-case inquiry to weigh actual prejudice'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.