Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2008 UT 75 - State v. Briggs

State v. Briggs’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

34 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Holgate · State v. Walker · United States v. Garcia · United States v. Fischel · State v. James

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Additionally, in those instances in which the trial court's findings include inferences drawn from the evidence, we will not take issue with those inferences unless the logic upon which their extrapolation from the evidence is based is so flawed as to render the inference clearly erroneous.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “An accomplice must ... have the intent that the underlying offense be committed.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “with the mental state required for the commission of an offense”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.