2008 UT App 118 - State v. Hight’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 2023
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 2002 UT App 342 - State v. Bickley · 2003 UT App 417 - State v. Corbitt · State v. Watson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“of burglary and stealing marijuana. Id. ¶ 4. Although he never admitted to stealing a watch, a set of keys, and a silver dollar collection, which were missing from the burglarized premises, the trial court ordered that the defendant pay restitution for those items. Id. The defendant claimed that the trial court erred in ordering restitution for the missing items because”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“will not disturb a trial court's restitution order unless it exceeds that prescribed by law or [the trial court] otherwise abused its discretion. A trial court will be deemed to have abused its discretion only if no reasonable [person] would take the view adopted by the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[hlow-ever, [that] a defendant cannot be ordered to pay restitution for criminal activities for which the defendant did not admit responsibility, was not convicted, or did not agree to pay restitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.