2008 UT App 139 - State v. Otterson’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2014
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Luce v. United States · State v. Dunn · State v. Winfield · Pratt v. Nelson · State v. Colwell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no prejudice resulted from this error because the trial record is replete with [the dlefendant's inconsistent statements.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Davis“unless it is manifest that the trial court so abused its discretion that there is a likelihood that injustice resulted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. R.O. v. E.O.“assum[ing], without deciding, that the prosecutor's statement that [the dJefendant was a liar was improper,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.