Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2008 UT App 233 - State v. Rowley

2008 UT App 233 - State v. Rowley’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 2022

6 state decisions

40200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Boyd · State v. Booker · State v. Romero · Wilson v. Valley Mental Health · State v. Cox

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “position occupied by a person in a position of authority, who, by reason of that position is able to exercise undue influence over the victim.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “An appellate court will reverse a jury conviction for insufficient evidence only when the evidence is sufficiently inconclusive or inherently improbable that reasonable minds must have entertained a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the erime of which he was convicted.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “evidence and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom in a light most favorable to the verdict”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.