2008 UT App 32 - State v. Garner’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2025
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · McMillan v. Pennsylvania · Harris v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Sixth Amendment's prohibition on elevating a sentence through judicial fact. finding only applies to the elevation of mandatory maximum sentences, not mandatory minimum sentences.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[tlo preserve an issue for appeal, a defendant must enter an objection on the record that is both t1mely and specific' and if the clalm is not preserved in the district court, then it”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Kropf“the court['s] fail[ure] to consider requisite statutory factors before imposing consecutive sentences,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Dana
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.