Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2008 UTAPP 329 - State v. Valdez

State v. Valdez’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Helms · State v. Galli · State v. Smith · State v. Gallegos · State v. Wright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] trial court need not state to what extent it considered each of the statutory factors at the sentencing hearing.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We review sentences for abuse of discretion. 'An abuse of discretion may be manifest if the actions of the judge in sentencing were inherently unfair or if the judge imposed a clearly excessive sentence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[Flive consecutive sentences of zero-to-five years creates an effective sentence of zero-to-twenty-five years. Although the potential length of the sentence is increased, the floor remains the same: zero.... By imposing consecutive sentences of zero-to-five years, the trial court merely shifted the final determination of the length of Defendant's sentence to the Board of Pardons.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.