2008 UT App 68 - State v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Bluff · State v. Kohl · State v. Gerrard · State v. Jaeger · 2006 UT App 511 - State v. Alfatlawi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“([The exercise of discretion in sentencing necessarily reflects the personal judgment of the court and the appellate court can properly find abuse only if it can be said that no reasonable [person] would take the view adopted by the trial court.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[the court is not required to give each factor equal weight.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“afford[ed] ... wide latitude in sentencing,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.