Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2008 VT 94 - Callahan v. Callahan

Callahan v. Callahan’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1408

Relies on Isbrandtsen v. North Branch Corp. · Cliche v. Cliche · Johnson v. Johnson · McDermott v. McDermott · In Re Lyon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In a contested divorce, equity requires that the family court distribute only the part of a spouse’s pension that accrued during the period of the marriage. The portion of the entitlement acquired during the marriage is calculated by factoring in the so-called coverture fraction. Where, as here, the parties voluntarily agree to an apportionment of a spouse’s pension, however, the court must enforce the plain language of the agreement. The pension provision in the stipulation plainly reads: “25% of [husband’s] monthly pension income shall be paid to [wife]” without reference to the length of the marriage or any applicable coverture fraction. Thus, it was reasonable for the court to determine that wife is entitled to receive 25% of husband’s gross retirement pay, and we will not disturb its order.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.