State v. Schaefer’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
37 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably State v. Popenhagen (2008), Taft Parsons, Jr. v. Associated Banc-Corp (2017)
37 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Gideon v. Wainwright · United States v. Wade · United States v. Agurs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the scope of discoverable materials is set out in statute and compliance with the statute will be enforced by the court.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[t]he defendant may cross-examine witnesses against the defendant.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“By any judge or clerk of a court or court commissioner or municipal judge, within the territory in which the officer or the court of which he or she is the officer has jurisdiction, to require the attendance of witnesses and their production of lawful instruments of evidence in any action, matter or proceeding pending or to be examined into before any court, magistrate, officer, arbitrator, board, committee or other person authorized to take testimony in the state.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.