State v. LaCount’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably State v. Warbelton (2009), State v. James R. Hunt (2014)
44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Rakas v. Illinois · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Shepard v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] reviewing court may search the record for reasons to sustain the circuit court's exercise of discretion.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“in accordance with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“testimony rests in the circuit court's discretion. On this issue, our review of a circuit court's use of its discretion is deferential, and we apply the erroneous exercise of discretion standard. The circuit court's exercise of discretion will not be overturned if the decision had a”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.