Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2008 WI 71 - State v. Davis

State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2021

18 state decisions

120200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. Goodchild v. Burke · 62 Wis. 2d 730 - State v. Stanislawski · 103 Wis. 2d 228 - State v. Dean · 99 Wis. 2d 269 - Barrera v. State · 955 So. 2d 90 - State v. Blank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the length of questioning, general conditions or circumstances in which the statement was taken, whether any excessive physical or psychological pressure was used, and whether any inducements, threats, methods, or strategies were utilized in order to elicit a statement from the defendant.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"A defendant's statements are voluntary if they are the product of free and unconstrained will, reflecting deliberateness of choice, as opposed to the result of a conspicuously unequal confrontation in which the pressures brought to bear on the defendant by representatives of the State exceeded the defendant's ability to resist."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Id., ¶23. We consider: (1) whether the suspect was told the test was over; (2) whether any time passed between the polygraph examination and the interview; (3) whether the officer who conducted the polygraph examination differed from the officer who conducted the interview; (4) whether the examination and interview were held in the same location; and (5) whether the examination was referred to during the interview. Id.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.