Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2008 WI 82 - State v. Grunke

State v. Grunke’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

33 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County · Union Bank v. Wolas · Seider v. O'CONNELL · 128 Wis. 2d 110 - State v. Holt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the words chosen for the statute exhibit a 'plain, clear statutory meaning,' without ambiguity, the statute is applied according to the plain meaning of the statutory terms.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “not in isolation but as part of a whole; in relation to the language of surrounding or closely-related statutes; and reasonably, to avoid absurd or unreasonable results.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “capable of being understood by reasonably well- informed persons in two or more senses[,]”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.