Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2008 WI 85 - State v. Sanders

State v. Sanders’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

26 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Chimel v. California · Maryland v. Buie · Arizona v. Hicks · J.L.A. v. T.A.T.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “once law enforcement officers are inside an area, including a home. Once inside an area a law enforcement officer may perform a warrantless 'protective sweep,' that is, 'a quick and limited search of premises, incident to an arrest and conducted to protect the safety of police officers or others.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “when the officer is lawfully in a position to observe the evidence, the evidence is in plain view of the officer, the discovery is inadvertent, and the item seized in itself ... provides probable cause to believe there is a connection between the evidence and criminal activity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'a reasonable belief based on specific and articulable facts which, taken together with the rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warranted the officer in believing that the area swept harbored an individual posing a danger to the officer or others.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.