Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2008 WI 93 - State v. Doss

State v. Doss’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
3
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably State v. Wood (2010), 331 Wis. 2d 568 - State v. Marinez (2011)

28 state decisions

210200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · Griffin v. California · United States v. Hasting

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “). As we have explained: Such exceptional cases are generally limited to cases in which the jury was erroneously denied the opportunity to hear important testimony bearing on an important issue of the case, when the jury had before it evidence not properly admitted that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A proper exercise of discretion requires that the circuit court rely on facts of record, the applicable law, and, using a demonstrable rational process, reach a reasonable decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “not in isolation but as part of a whole; in relation to the language of surrounding or closely-related statutes; and reasonably, to avoid absurd or unreasonable results.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.