Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2008 WI 96 - Hefty v. Strickhouser

Hefty v. Strickhouser’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably 387 Wis. 2d 384 - State v. Raytrell K. Fitzgerald (2019), 260 North 12th Street, LLC v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation (2011)

36 state decisions

320200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc. · State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County · 107 Wis. 2d 400 - Loy v. Bunderson · 115 Wis. 2d 334 - State v. Pharr · 162 Wis. 2d 261 - Johnson v. Allis Chalmers Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'has examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law, and, using a demonstrated rational process, reached a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach.'”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the circuit court examined the relevant facts; applied a proper standard of law; and using a demonstrative rational process, reached a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “For failure of.. . any party to .. . obey any order of court, the court in which the action is pending may make such orders in regard to the failure as are just, including but not limited to orders authorized under s. 804.12(2)(a).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.