State v. Krueger’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

10 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “I did not get a sense from this child that she demonstrated a level of sophistication that [she] would be able to maintain some sort of fabricated story, for lack of a better way of describing it. She did not appear to me to be highly sophisticated so that she could maintain that kind of consistency throughout unless it was something that she had experienced.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Stanley J. Maday, Jr.

2. “[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 384 Wis. 2d 415 - State v. Burks

3. “expert testimony on typical signs of whether a child has been coached or evidences suggestibility and whether the complainant child exhibits such signs”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Stanley J. Maday, Jr.