Pries v. McMillon’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 150 Wis. 2d 688 - State v. Blalock · 80 Wis. 2d 525 - Cords v. Anderson · Lodl v. Progressive Northern Insurance · 200 Wis. 2d 1 - Kimps v. Hill · 118 Wis. 2d 488 - Domino v. Walworth County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it should have been self-evident to Mc-Millon that once he saw the chains had been removed, he had a ministerial duty based on the known danger to stop the disassembly until the chains were reattached and to not jump on the unchained stall.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pries v. McMillon“was aware the chains were undone,... was aware that inmates were standing next to the stuck stall,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pries v. McMillon“knew that if the chains holding those back stalls to the wall had been removed, they could fall.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pries v. McMillon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.