State v. Swope’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · Frye v. United States · 208 Wis. 2d 166 - In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. Cook · 216 Wis. 2d 768 - State v. Sullivan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Hearsay data upon which the expert's opinion is predicated may not be automatically admitted into evidence by the proponent and used for the truth of the matter asserted unless the data are otherwise admissible under a recognized exception to the hearsay rule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“whether he or she has superior knowledge in the area in which the precise question lies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.