State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
June 2009
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 115 Wis. 2d 371 - State v. Gilbert · 75 Wis. 2d 244 - Klimas v. State · State v. Esser · 65 Wis. 2d 415 - Byrd v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the committee did not anticipate that the [imposed-at-the-same-time] language was susceptible to being read as saying credit must be awarded against all concurrent sentences imposed at the same time, regardless whether each sentence meets the 'in connection with' requirement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnson“If his attorney was ineffective by failing to assist Johnson in taking the necessary steps to make his custody `in connection with' his 2004 case, [Johnson] is entitled to relief in the form of sentence credit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnson“[t]here is nothing in the statute suggesting an exception to the `in connection with' requirement when credit is due against a concurrent sentence imposed at the same time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.